Aussie Liberals’ family-deforming policies

After 6 years of Labor (leftist) misrule, Aussies have turned to Liberals (center-right) to lead their government. American news outlets like the Wall Street Journal are treating incoming prime minister Tony Abbot’s victory as a lesson to Republicans in how to win elections. I’m not so sure what we can learn here, other than bad policy makes for good politics. Australian Liberals’ return to power hardly counts as a win for limited government. Reihan Salam writes in National Review:

In praising John Howard’s successful Liberal-National government, Abbott cites the fact that it tripled spending on child care and doubled the number of child-care places available, and its support for more flexible workplace arrangements which contributed to a sharp increase in the labor force participation of women. He also favorably referenced the Howard government’s Baby Bonus, a universal payment to new mothers, which was recently abolished by the Labor government.

Tony Abbott, the new face of conservatism?I can’t believe I’m saying this, but Labor has it right! Outsourced motherhood? Government paternalism? That sounds to me like the family-deforming welfare statism that’s ravaged the American lower and middle classes for decades.

Australian Liberals assume higher women’s workforce participation (“equality”) is a good thing, worth subsidizing. But is it?

  • If you reject driving children into the arms of government nannies, paid for by men’s taxes that would otherwise go to increasing his ability to provide for his family, then no.
  • If women’s instinct to care for her children must be reversed so she can compete against men for jobs and drive down wages to increase corporate profits, then yes.

What Australian Liberal policies do in effect is disrupt the chemical process that creates bonds of love between men and women in which children are born and raised. Taken together, they are a case of big government filling a void in the social contract that it deliberately helped to create. That’s a progressive legacy, not a conservative one.



2 thoughts on “Aussie Liberals’ family-deforming policies

  1. Right again, Joseph! We’ve known for some time that two-income families put a lot of stress on single-income families. Couples that include a stay-at-home Mom and a single source of income must compete with couples that include a working Mom and a second source of income for a limited supply of goods and services. Economically, it is a losing proposition; quality of life suffers. But the stay-at-home Mom generally produces a greater number and a more self-sufficient brood who will grow up and be taxed to cover old-age support the more materialistic, double-working couple who often fail to even replace themselves.

    Posted by Linus | September 12, 2013, 9:47 am


  1. Pingback: The child gap | - April 23, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams 1826


Red Pill Report is a labor of love for the many contributors who post here. They share their thoughts and talents with us because, like you, they love this great Country and hope to contribute in some small way to returning America to the principles on which it was founded. How can you help? Please share our articles with friends and family. Share buttons for Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and Email are found at the bottom of each article. Our writers also love your comments, so please share your thoughts with us, when you can. We appreciate our readers, and would love to have more! Thank you!



%d bloggers like this: