Advertisements
2012 Presidential Election, Media, Mitt Romney

OMG! Obama Media Group Is Busted…Again!


Moira Fitzgerald

Think of the Establishment Media as being like a casino: Once people realize that the game is rigged, they’ll simply ignore it altogether. And like most fantasies, when belief goes, so does the fantasy itself.

Just when you thought the Obama Media Group couldn’t disgrace itself any further, yet more evidence of their malpractice has come to light.

Members of the media who are covering Mitt Romney’s campaign were caught on a hot mic colluding with each other as to what questions were to be asked.  When you listen to the audio it is clear that the plan was to make sure that whoever was called upon would ask the “right question.”  In this case the “right question” was essentially to ask Romney if he stood by his earlier statements or did he now think that his earlier statements were a mistake.  Here are the seven questions asked:

1.  Reporter brings up that Romney had a “toughly worded statement last night,” and asks, “Do you regret the tone at all given what we know now?”

2. “Do you think, though, coming so soon after the events really had unfolded over night was appropriate, to be weighing in on this as this crisis was unfolding in real time?” Follow-up: “What did the White House do wrong then, Gov. Romney, if they put out a statement saying they disagreed with it?”

3. “The world is watching. Isn’t this itself a mixed signal when you criticize the administration at a time that Americans are being killed? Shouldn’t politics stop for this?”

4. “Some people have said that you jumped the gun a little bit in putting that statement out last night and that you should have waited until more details were available. Do you regret having that statement come out so early before we learned about all of the things that were happening?”

5. “If you had known last night that the ambassador had died, and obviously, I’m gathering you did not know . . . if you had known that the ambassador had died, would you have issued such a strongly-issued statement?”

6. Reporter comments that Romney is running on his “economic know-how and private sector experience,” and adds, “but now that foreign policy and the situation in the Middle East has been thrust into the presidential campaign, can you talk about why specifically you think you are better qualified than President Obama to handle these issues?”

7. “How specifically, Governor Romney, would a President Romney have handled this situation differently than President Obama did? You spoke out before midnight, when all the facts weren’t known. How would you have handled this differently than the president did?”

Note the repetitive nature of the questions.  Note the obvious attempts to portray the discussion as if it’s an established fact that Romney had made an error in his earlier statement.  The questions assume that this is the case and so what does he, Romney, think about it now?  Note the usual weasel words such as “some people have said…” and “do you regret the tone…”

Of course in the hands of Kool-aid drunk propagandists masquerading as “journalists” these kinds of questions remind one of the old joke: “So, have you stopped beating your wife yet?”  The “question” is not intended to elicit further details but rather to rebuke the person being questioned by implying that he has made a mistake. And starting with this premise, the answer will either be construed as a “denial” of making a mistake or acknowledgment of the “mistake.”

When did rebuking the subject of an interview become the media’s job? Or, if you think that issuing stinging rebukes is appropriate, then why doesn’t the same media issue rebukes to Obama and other Democrats?  Questions designed to gather information or shed light are one thing. And sometimes tough questioning is called for.  But this was a clear case of the media promoting a specific agenda.  The conclusion is inescapable.  This was narrative-building.  This was an attempt to promote the idea that Romney is not a statesman, that he is not qualified and that the people should not vote for him.

Generally speaking, when the same question is asked repeatedly, it has the intended effect of discrediting the answer.  In this case, by asking the question over and over again the implication was that Romney had not satisfactorily answered it.  This type of cynical ploy is designed to create the impression that the person being questioned is evasive while at the same time forcing him to repeat his answer and thus re-emphasizing it.  And since Romney’s answer was put in a negative light, it was the negative spin that was highlighted for the rest of the news cycle.

David Gregory of NBC tweeted:

Romney appears to have launched a political attack even before facts of embassy violence were known. Then uses day to issue vague FP vision

Then there was this, from TIME Magazine’s Mark Halperin:

Romney’s doubling down on criticism of the President for the statement coming out of Cairo is likely to be seen as one of the most craven and ill-advised tactical moves in this entire campaign.

As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, Romney’s only “mistake” in this case was to irritate the pro-Obama punditry:

The Obama Presidential campaign jumped on the remarks Wednesday as inappropriate, yet a “senior Administration official” had told the website Politico later on Tuesday night that “The statement by Embassy Cairo was not cleared by Washington and does not reflect the views of the United States government.” So the White House can walk away from its own diplomats, but Mr. Romney can’t criticize them?

The broader point is that the attacks on the embassies do raise questions about how America has fared in the world in the last four years. Throughout his candidacy, Mr. Romney has supported the necessity of America’s global leadership, sometimes against the wishes of Republican voters. His comments this week are consistent with that worldview, which is also consistent with that of every recent conservative President.

His political faux pax was to offend a pundit class that wants to cede the foreign policy debate to Mr. Obama without thinking seriously about the trouble for America that is building in the world.

This is why the reputation of the Establishment Media, a totally reactionary cadre determined to protect Barack Obama at all costs and maintain the status quo in Washington, has plummeted to troubling new lows this campaign cycle.  Think of the Establishment Media as being like a casino: Once people realize that the game is rigged, they’ll simply ignore it altogether.  And like most fantasies, when belief goes, so does the fantasy itself.

And another thing:

Even those Democrats who sincerely feel that Romney spoke out of turn have no right to point fingers.  In 2004, they not only nominated a 1%er in John Kerry but they applauded him for attempting to score political points against the incumbent.

On a busy Labor Day dash across the swing states of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio, Kerry assailed the president’s economic policies and paid special attention to the war in Iraq, calling it “the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.” He said he aimed to withdraw U.S. troops from the country during his first term.

And as Ed Morrissey at Hot Air points out, there was a time when Barack Obama was a candidate who also had no qualms about doing the same thing.

Remember that time when a major-party presidential nominee went on television immediately after the deaths of several Americans abroad to attack the policies of the current administration and his opponent?  Remember how the media repeatedly demanded to know whether he regretted the timing of that criticism, and whether he was ashamed at not providing a united political front in the face of tragedy? Yeah, neither do I.

This CNN interview took place in July 2008, immediately after the deaths of nine US troops in Afghanistan:

Advertisements

Discussion

9 thoughts on “OMG! Obama Media Group Is Busted…Again!

  1. Unfortunately, I fear that there are still many Americans who eat up everything the mainstream media feeds them. Those who have awakened to the massive coalition that has been carefully cultivated in academia, media, government and its bureaucracies, it begins to feel “too big to fail.” I pray to God that we can yet turn the tide. I thank Moira and the Red Pill for your heroic effort to do so.

    Posted by Linus | September 14, 2012, 6:52 am
    • Thank you! You know, what’s amazing to me is that even though we all know this collusion goes on…when I witness it first-hand, I am still astonished and almost can’t believe we are living in a society that is so similar to the propagandized countries of the old Eastern Bloc.

      It makes me appreciate so much more people like Moira…and other bloggers, new media groups, and ‘real’ investigative journalists who refuse to be silenced, and will not fall into lock-step with the narrative of the traditional media.

      Posted by Red Pill Report | September 14, 2012, 7:02 am
  2. Excellent article. I hope Dana Perino is right. Last night on The Five, she said she thinks that in the end the things Romney said will be proven right and people will see his reaction favorably. Of course, she was speaking of conservatives. The MSM won’t ever feel that way.

    Posted by Elaine | September 14, 2012, 7:53 am
  3. What a scary world we live in when people in power and those who control the flow of information conspire to destroy the rights of the majority. I’m sure that some of the ‘journalists’ are taken care of by those in power, but the majority just do it because it will impress their peers. They’re like a bunch of teenage boys doing progressively stupid things to impress each other. This typically ends in a catastrophe in the end. Let’s hope it does for this group of conspirators.

    Posted by Cucciolo | September 14, 2012, 9:30 am
  4. Not that they wouldn’t have framed their “questions” the same way to Romney regardless, but I believe the OMG felt the narrative slipping away and decided to double-down. Romney was the one acting and sounding presidential during this crises and was exposing their beloved Obama as inept and incompetent. It was “circle the wagons” time. Romney needs to pull a Reagan tactic and go right over the media’s head and speak directly to Americans. Expose the OMG as the low-life, bedwetting, ankle biting petulant liberal children they are! (As in above video clip). The biased media stories are coming at us exponentially now and will reach critical mass very soon at which point their will be an event that exposes their bias as never before to the wavering voter.
    I think the lap dog media really resents the fact that so many of us can watch their every move, listen to every word they speak, read everything they write and almost instantaneously blow it out of the water as a double standard, false narrative or out and out lie. They no longer work in a vacuum. The new media, lead by people like Moira and you, Red Pill Report, as well as all who put out a tweet or comment on a blog will prevail and the MSM’s protected kingdom will be obliterated.

    Posted by Karl | September 14, 2012, 9:37 am
  5. And those of us who warned about Obama 4 years ago were all extremists and racists. Just imagine the economy, the “real progress”, the millions of poor lifted into economic freedom if the minion media was not in the tank for the left.

    Posted by Geoff Caldwell | September 14, 2012, 9:53 am
    • Love the term ‘minion media,’ Geoff! That is so accurately descriptive!

      Fortunately, the days of the traditional media controlling the narrative is over. The liberal media HATES the emergence of bloggers & new media, and the sustained popularity of conservative talk radio. They can no longer manipulate stories and put their lefty spin on things without getting called out for it. Sure, they’ll still do it…but as they continue to get exposed…their credibility will continue to crumble until eventually, they will lose all relevence.

      It’s sad, really. Had they maintained some level of journalistic integrity, they could have been heroes to the American people instead of complicit tools, like they are now.

      Posted by Red Pill Report | September 18, 2012, 12:55 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Constitution Day 2012: The 'Fourth Estate' worthy no more | Caldwell's Corner - September 17, 2012

  2. Pingback: Constitution Day 2012: The ‘Fourth Estate’ worthy no more « red pill report - September 18, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams 1826

PLEASE SHARE US ON FACEBOOK & TWITTER

Red Pill Report is a labor of love for the many contributors who post here. They share their thoughts and talents with us because, like you, they love this great Country and hope to contribute in some small way to returning America to the principles on which it was founded. How can you help? Please share our articles with friends and family. Share buttons for Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and Email are found at the bottom of each article. Our writers also love your comments, so please share your thoughts with us, when you can. We appreciate our readers, and would love to have more! Thank you!

Archives

Topics

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: